• UPWARD TREND
  • DOWNWARD TREND
  • NO
    CHANGE

Best Ruby on Rails Developer & Best Ruby on Rails Development - Apr 2014

RANK COMPANY NAME YEAR FOUNDED REVENUE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES ACTIVE CLIENTS CLIENT RETENTION RATE PRICING CLIENTS Composite score based on criterias and quality of work observed.
0100
GVGE
Firm's ability to use project analysis to help provide insight into what the customer needs in the application. Firm's set standards for web application development with Ruby on Rails. Firm's ability to apply accepted standards for functionality. Firm's ability to provide implementation assistance for companies to implement Ruby on Rails. Firm's ability to provide customer support on a timely basis. Change in Rank Indicates shift in rank from previous month's rank.
1st Award
EL Passion

Warsaw,Poland Kamil Starski +48-79254_1588 Visit EL Passion File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2008 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 25 84% M CrowdCurity, Aspireboard, CanIRank
100%
100 100 100 100 100 NC More Info
2nd Award
Little Stream Software

-,Oregon Eric Davis 888-499-_2510 Visit Little Stream Software File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2003 $3 million - $4,999,999 26 - 50 35 85% M Advantage Route Systems, Shane and Peter, Inc.
99.8%
100 100 100 99 100 +2 More Info
3rd Award
Agile Infoways

Ahmedabad,India Ronak Shah 91-794005_0063 Visit Agile Infoways File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2006 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 53 85% H Live Data Bank, WishList, AutoCastle Messenger, ExactCharge
99.4%
100 98 100 99 100 -1 More Info
4
Railsware

Beaverton,Oregon Sergey Korolev 646-397-_4918 Visit Railsware File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2006 $3 million - $4,999,999 51 - 100 106 90% M Playhem Poker, Plum District, Montessori Compass, SendGrid
99%
100 99 97 99 100 +1 More Info
5
Developer4Lease

Markham,Canada Galit Izik 1-888834_8932 Visit Developer4Lease File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2008 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 86 88% M Epic Advertising (AzoogleADS), Home Hardware, Hersheys, Wikidomo
98.6%
100 99 97 98 99 -2 More Info
6
Softway Solutions

Houston,Texas Mohammed Anwar 281-661-_3993 Visit Softway Solutions File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2004 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 37 84% M Shell Oil Training Center, Nabors International, ExxonMobil Exploration, HoldMyMemories.com
98.4%
100 99 96 97 100 NC More Info
7
RORGURU

San Jose,California Amit Sarkar 800-706-_6973 Visit RORGURU File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2002 $250,000 - $999,000 26 - 50 30 90% M Bay radiology, Rainmaker, AES
98.4%
96 100 98 100 98 NC More Info
8
iDeveloper Network

Maidenhead,United Kingdom Dominic Williams 44-0391_2678 Visit iDeveloper Network File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2000 $1 million - $2,999,999 1 - 10 25 84% H Appliance Computing Inc., Cheetah Computers LLC, eAcceleration Inc., Fontana Capital
97.6%
96 98 96 100 98 NC More Info
9
Ruby on Rails

Bellevue,Washington David Heinemeier 425-274-_0657 Visit Ruby on Rails File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2003 Over $5 million 51 - 100 100+ 90% M Confidential
97.2%
96 98 97 99 96 NC More Info
10
Synerzip

Dallas,Texas Hemant Elhence 469-322-0_349 Visit Synerzip File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2004 Over $5 million Above 100 38 82% M SEED Capital Partners, Hall Financial Group, HO2 Partners, Austin Ventures
96.8%
96 98 97 96 97 NC More Info

Evaluation Criteria for Ruby on Rails Development

Ruby on Rails is a web application framework with the goal of allowing developers to create web applications quickly and efficiently for use on the internet. Developers use Ruby as a means of creating efficient web applications on a framework that holds specific standards and therefore can be looked into and edited by anyone with Ruby knowledge. Ruby on Rails has a large focus on programming with the user in mind instead of the computer.

Our evaluation criteria focuses on the important characteristics of Ruby on Rails development and the different aspects of development that influence the quality of the final product. Development companies need to provide a balance of service and application quality to ensure that customers are content with the finished product.

Project analysis, the first aspect of our evaluation, focuses on the initial analysis of the project by the agency to better understand the type of development work that needs to be done.  We analyze their recognition of project needs and their ability to develop a strategy that meets those needs.

Next we analyze the development standards of each vendor. We assess their expectation of quality of the web application development and whether their final product lives up to the standards set to ensure that the code will run smoothly without errors or bugs.

Another part of the evaluation focuses on the functionality. How usable is the website? Is the application easy to use and understand for the client?

Implementation assistance, the fourth criterion, reviews how the vendor is able to provide assistance either through direct support or advice on how to implement the code.

Lastly, our evaluation of customer support focuses on contacting both past and present customers of the company to better understand their ability to provide adequate support and to resolve issues on a timely basis.

General Queries

  • What type of needs analysis was conducted before work initiated?
  • What type of a ROI were you anticipating, what was achieved and in what time frame?
  • What would be 3 things you would change about your experience?
  • What was your total investment?
  • Rate your overall experience (1-10; 10 being the highest).

 

Project Specific Queries :

  • What form of planning and strategy was undertaken by the agency before they started on your project?
  • How much guidance did the web development company provide during the planning stages?
  • How long did it take for your website to reach final completion?
  • Did the web development company provide an analysis of features and make suggestions for improvements?
  • Did the web development company assist with implementation or hosting for the project?