Best Android Development Company (ies)
  • UPWARD TREND
  • DOWNWARD TREND
  • NO
    CHANGE

Best Android Development Company (ies) - Apr 2014

RANK COMPANY NAME YEAR FOUNDED REVENUE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES ACTIVE CLIENTS CLIENT RETENTION RATE PRICING CLIENTS Composite score based on criterias and quality of work observed.
0100
GVGE
Firm's ability to develop quality code for use on the Android platform. Firm's ability to create powerful designs for view on the Android platform. Firm's ability to provide support to its customers. Firm's ability to provide services to customers in an efficient amount of time. Firm's ability to test for bugs and flaws in the program code before release. Change in Rank Indicates shift in rank from previous month's rank.
1st Award
Intersog

Chicago,USA Julia Guzunova 773-305-_0885 Visit Intersog File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2005 $1 million - $2,999,999 51 - 100 36 92% M Toodalu LLC., O'Reilly, Magme Media, For-side
100%
100 100 100 100 100 +2 More Info
2nd Award
Zaptech Solutions

Ahmedabad,India Hemant Kumar 91-794002_7248 Visit Zaptech Solutions File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2006 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 100+ 93% M The Mobile Store, Essar, Candy Bar, AAPKA Investments
99.8%
100 100 100 99 100 +3 More Info
3rd Award
Intellectsoft

Campbell,USA Paul Bach 408-879-7_338 Visit Intellectsoft File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2007 $3 million - $4,999,999 Above 100 100 86% M Bombardier, Guiness, Qualcomm, Ernst & Young
99.4%
100 99 100 98 100 -1 More Info
4
Blue Rocket

San Francisco,USA Markus Duffin 415-581-_0500 Visit Blue Rocket File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2008 Over $5 million 51 - 100 10 95% M WebMD Pregnancy, Sheet Music Direct by Hal Leonard, Zinio Newsstand, TripleSpot by AAA
99%
98 100 99 98 100 -3 More Info
5
Compsoft plc

Alton,Hampshire Stephen Holmes 44-845370_7274 Visit Compsoft plc File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2001 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 50+ 90% H iBiker Apps, Money Penny, TAG Farnborough Airport, npower
98.8%
98 99 100 98 99 -1 More Info
6
Bruce Clay

Moorpark,USA Bruce Clay 805-517-_1900 Visit Bruce Clay File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
1996 Over $5 million 51 - 100 200 95% M Edmunds, Turner Broadcasting, AT+T, Direct Brands
98.4%
100 99 96 97 100 NC More Info
7
AppFutures Ltd.

Glasgow,Scotland John McCollum 44-795130_4634 Visit AppFutures Ltd. File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2010 $1 million - $2,999,999 11 - 25 20 90% M Confidential
98.2%
98 96 99 98 100 NC More Info
8
[x]cube LABS

Dallas,USA Sri Dhar Muppidi 800-805-_5783 Visit [x]cube LABS File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2008 $250,000 - $999,000 1 - 10 100+ 92% H Mattle Inc., Hasbro, 24 Hour Fitness, Texas Instruments
98%
96 99 98 100 97 NC More Info
9
Klocwork

Burlington,USA Mike Laginski 866-556-_2967 Visit Klocwork File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2001 Over $5 million 51 - 100 850+ 98% M Bombardier, amdocs, Alcatel Lucent, Clarion
97.6%
96 98 96 100 98 NC More Info
10
Lemberg Solutions Limited

London,Bedfordshire Olha 44-207193_4928 Visit Lemberg Solutions Limited File A Complaint
Commend This Agency
2007 $1 million - $2,999,999 26 - 50 26 87% M Parrot, P&O, V&A, PHM
97.4%
96 97 98 97 99 NC More Info

Evaluation Criteria for Android Development

The Android operating system is very popular in modern day smart phones and is open to a wide audience of users and developers. Development firms work with the Android to create software for use on the platform for a variety of uses. Phones are no longer restricted to just making calls or messaging, they are used to track information and for business or personal uses that can even rival computers. It has become even more important to have developers working to create new innovative applications.

We evaluate android development firms that work to develop applications for the open source Android mobile operating system. Development firms work to develop code for the use of clients for distribution to a company's clients or for the general public. Our evaluation criteria is based on the work that a development firm is able to produce for the platform based on their competitors.

The first criterion reviewed by us is the development quality. We evaluate a vendor’s work to create quality code that will function on the platform based on commonly accepted standards for development.

Next, we focus on the design quality. We assess the overall quality of the graphics as they display on the Android platform. Do the images compliment the development work, and make the application more effective?

Customer support is another aspect of android development that we review which determines the overall quality of service being provided. Does the vendor work to resolve issues with the application? How available is the support team to quickly resolve issues?

We also evaluate the speed at which the agency is capable of developing code. We review the vendor’s efficiency in the development process and being able to meet deadlines set between them and the client.

The final evaluation criterion is based on the level of bug testing the agency does prior to releasing software to the client. Are the applications free from bugs to prevent issues from arising after development?

General Queries

  • What type of needs analysis was conducted before work initiated?
  • What type of a ROI were you anticipating, what was achieved and in what time frame?
  • What would be 3 things you would change about your experience?
  • What was your total investment?
  • Rate your overall experience (1-10; 10 being the highest).

 

Project Specific Queries :

  • What type of application was developed for you by the service provider?
  • How long did it take to strategize and plan the development of the application?
  • How long was the application in development before it was released?
  • Did the service provider fix any issues which were found with it, if any?
  • What level of communication did you have with the service provider? Were you in direct contact with the development team or a representative?